Interactive Research Summary

Finite Prevention Windows for HIV PEP

A visual walkthrough of route-specific prevention windows under irreversible proviral integration — why the 72-hour PEP guideline compresses to ~16–28 hours for injection exposure, and what it means for PWID.

Scroll to explore
Slide 01 — The Central Claim
Finite Prevention Windows: Why the 72-Hour Rule Fails for Injection Exposure
The 72-hour PEP window is an artifact of mucosal transmission. For parenteral (injection) exposure, accelerated viral establishment compresses the effective window to ~16–28 hours. The standard guideline does not apply.
Slide 02 — The Current Paradigm
PEP functions as a safety net for mucosal exposure
CDC guidelines permit PEP initiation up to 72 hours post-exposure. This window is implicitly treated as universal, but it was derived from mucosal transmission dynamics where epithelial barriers create a “lag phase” before systemic infection.
Slide 03 — The Absorbing State
Infection is a race toward the Absorbing State
Infection progresses through three states: Susceptible, Seeded, and Integrated. Once proviral integration occurs (Z=2), the process is irreversible. PEP efficacy decays to zero. The critical formula: EPEP(t) ≤ 1 − Pint(t).
Slide 04 — Stochastic Dominance
Injection delivers a massive head start
Parenteral exposure bypasses all physical barriers. Mucosal exposure delivers a low inoculum (V0 ≈ 1) that must cross epithelial barriers. Injection delivers a high inoculum (V0 ≈ 1000) directly to the bloodstream, forcing rapid integration.
Slide 05 — The Compression Zone
High inoculum compresses the prevention window ~3-fold
The prevention window compresses by ~3× for injection exposure. The mucosal window (blue, solid) persists to tcrit ≈ 68–76h. The parenteral window (red, dashed) collapses to tcrit ≈ 16–28h. Between ~28 and ~68 hours is the “Compression Zone” — where mucosal PEP still works but parenteral PEP has already failed.
Slide 06 — Experimental Validation
Non-human primate data show route-dependent compression of the prevention window
Non-human primate data confirms the model predictions. Tsai et al. (IV challenge) and Otten et al. (vaginal challenge) show the predicted divergence. The 72-hour rule is an artifact of mucosal transmission dynamics — it does not apply to direct bloodstream inoculation.
Slide 07 — The Critical Time
The critical time for injection is 16-28 hours
By 48 hours post-injection, PEP efficacy falls below 50% across all source viral loads. The probability of irreversible integration is already dominating the system. The critical intervention window for parenteral exposure is 16–28 hours, not 72.
Slide 08 — Structural Barriers
Structural barriers delay care well beyond the biological limit
The median PWID access delay is ~72 hours — three times the biological limit. Withdrawal, policing, housing instability, and geographic isolation create structural barriers that push healthcare access well beyond the effective parenteral window.
Slide 09 — The Failure Mode
The Failure Mode: A Structural-Biological Mismatch
Approximately 2% of PWID access PEP within the effective window. The overlap between the access delay distribution and the efficacy curve yields a population-level bound: PEP ≤ 6.8%. This is a structural-biological mismatch, not a pharmacological failure.
Slide 10 — The Pivot to PrEP
When the window is too small, we must close it before exposure
When the window is too small, the only option is to close it before exposure. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) removes the time variable entirely. Long-acting injectable options like lenacapavir provide immediate, continuous protection without requiring post-exposure access.
Slide 11 — Summary & Implications
Summary and Implications: The Biology, The Mismatch, The Pivot
We cannot slow down the virus. We must stay ahead of it. Integration is irreversible and compresses the injection window to ~16–28h. Structural barriers delay PWID access to ~72h, resulting in <10% efficacy. PrEP must become the primary prevention strategy for PWID.

HIV PEP Timing & Prevention Windows

An overview of the framework's four interconnected domains: mathematical foundations, route-dependent windows, structural access barriers, and prevention architecture.

Mind Map: HIV PEP Prevention Windows — Mathematical Framework, Route-Dependent Compression, Structural Barriers, Prevention Implications

The HIV Prevention Clock

Why route matters for PEP efficacy — mapping biological windows for mucosal vs. parenteral exposure and the structural access crisis for PWID.

The Closing Window: Why HIV PEP Fails for Injection Exposure — Infographic